Today's hottest deals

HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:36
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 57.2
45% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 145
16% 127 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 38
28% 37.6 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 27
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 242
Write 218
Mixed 200
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 5.4
58% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.6
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 64.8
69% 111 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 81%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234,
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 16.7
Write 5.7
10% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
53% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 947F947F SH564568FH8N6PHSFG 947F947F SH564568FH8N6PHSFG 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 24" 1280 720 ACR02FA GN246HL
Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback