PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131125 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 15:21 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 73% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
60.1%
Good
|
55% 88.6 Pts
|
32% 249 Pts
|
18% 292 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$100
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.1%
Below average
|
31% 39.8 fps
|
29% 36.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 126 120 124 121 112 MB/s
|
85.1%
Excellent
|
80% 356 MB/s
|
145% 49.5 MB/s
|
196% 262 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Constellation CS ISE 1TB
722GB free
Firmware: CE02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 190 190 189 191 189 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
120% 164 MB/s
|
199% 1.53 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.9%
Poor
|
26% 9.17 GB/s
|
27% 9.37 GB/s
|
51% 79.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 0 | 13.3" | 1280 720 | AUS13D1 ASUS MQ13AH |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $79Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 217x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 100x |
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 93x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $140Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 37x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $465 |