Performance Results

Gaming 418%
Desktop 123%
Workstation 554%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics348% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive450% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220901
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:50
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$417
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 224
2-Core 453
129% 253 Pts
4-Core 909
8-Core 1,655
154% 1,282 Pts
64-Core 4,236
262% 4,236 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,732
Asus(1043 88EF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
348% Outstanding
Lighting 523
Reflection 589
Parallax 729
426% 613 fps
MRender 540
Gravity 581
Splatting 312
374% 478 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 348%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
763GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3048 3135 2157 1777 1777 1759 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
450% Outstanding
Read 2966
Write 3,470
Mixed 3,175
SusWrite 2,276
671% 2,972 MB/s
4K Read 86.1
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 124
394% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,686
DQ Write 1423
DQ Mixed 1,576
1,175% 1,562 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 450%
Great: 477%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
102GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 480 423 411 420 391 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 454
Mixed 413
SusWrite 429
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 54.6
181% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$220
141GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 486 482 454 244 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 484
Mixed 464
SusWrite 386
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 52.4
176% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 35.5
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 30.6
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 27 60 38.2" 1280 720 GSM7735 38GL950G
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 2,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 290%
Desktop 122%
Workstation 346%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback