Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:50
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 163
2-Core 316
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 842
89% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 119
Parallax 122
106% 124 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 88.3
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 125 144 142 184 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 455
Write 401
Mixed 326
SusWrite 168
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 11.2
68% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 98.6
DQ Mixed 35.5
45% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 60%
Adata SP600 256GB
109GB free
Firmware: 5.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 266 266 265 265 265 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 268
Mixed 249
SusWrite 265
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 38.9
136% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 144
146% 235 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 161 163 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 118
Mixed 82
SusWrite 162
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 5 60 34.1" 3440 1377 GSM76F6 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $756
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback