Today's hottest deals

AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 301
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 956
95% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,214
75% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 34.6
20% 27.2 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 27
Splatting 22.5
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1723 1761 1784 1827 1834 1189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,578
Write 1,791
Mixed 1,667
SusWrite 1,686
380% 1,680 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 74.7
255% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,217
DQ Write 909
DQ Mixed 1075
800% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 292%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 28.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 30.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 0 65" 1280 720 PHL01EA Philips FTV
Typical SER Builds (Compare 814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback