Today's hottest deals

MSI 790GX-G65 (MS-7576)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7576
MotherboardMSI 790GX-G65 (MS-7576)  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:49
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Memory 12
1-Core 17.3
2-Core 23.6
11% 17.6 Pts
4-Core 32.3
8-Core 30.9
4% 31.6 Pts
64-Core 29.8
2% 29.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 44 46 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 70.3
Mixed 37
SusWrite 45.5
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 88%
EM641AA MP3 Player 2GB
1GB free, PID 5661
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3.9
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.5
3% 2.87 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 571
7% 571 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 4 64 0" 1280 720
Typical 790GX-G65 (MS-7576) Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 790GX-G65 (MS-7576)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $518
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback