Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory14.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:49
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 64
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
94% 181 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 987
95% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 153A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22% Poor
Lighting 27.9
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 22.5
23% 25.6 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 32.9
21% 23.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22%
Great: 45%
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 11.3
8% 12.3 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 0.2
7% 9.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IM2P33F8ABR2-512GB 512GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0513A0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,834
Write 296
Mixed 52.7
154% 727 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 32
204% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 471
440% 678 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 279%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG PUSKILL PSK-D4D22M3200BL-16G 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 12.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 189 60 144 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5A23 23MP55
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback