Today's hottest deals

Asrock A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:48
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 56
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 92.1
39% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 154
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 132
Parallax 290
96% 180 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 146
Splatting 201
157% 192 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12574
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 23 22 23 23 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 353
Write 359
Mixed 316
SusWrite 72.4
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 28.7
96% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 167
131% 182 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.1
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 27 60 23" 1280 720 ACR0318 Acer H236HL
Typical A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback