PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z270-K (all builds) |
Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161122 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 14:42 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 76% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
65.9%
Good
|
61% 103 Pts
|
39% 293 Pts
|
21% 339 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$140
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.2%
Above average
|
51% 63.5 fps
|
52% 63.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$50
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 192 178 172 169 170 MB/s
|
74.5%
Very good
|
64% 288 MB/s
|
106% 38.8 MB/s
|
198% 286 MB/s
|
![]() Crucial MX500 500GB-$37
440GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 397 416 433 426 416 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
79% 351 MB/s
|
107% 36.2 MB/s
|
235% 328 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
57.2%
Above average
|
57% 19.9 GB/s
|
56% 19.5 GB/s
|
41% 97.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
49% | 28% | 53 | 209 | 55 | 144 | 24" | 1920 1017 | ACR02F9 GN246HL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $289Bench 84%, 634,862 samples | 885x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $140Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 416x |
Core i7-7700Intel $185Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 262x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 280x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $119Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 269x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $140Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 241x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $906 |