PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 57 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20231007 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 14:34 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | BIH-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
76.4%
Very good
|
77% 137 Pts
|
70% 586 Pts
|
70% 1,124 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 580-$120
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.1%
Average
|
44% 62.8 fps
|
45% 56.4 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$119
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 439 443 437 429 432 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
101% 447 MB/s
|
162% 56 MB/s
|
146% 197 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 260 260 259 259 260 MB/s
|
96.4%
Outstanding
|
78% 347 MB/s
|
163% 55.5 MB/s
|
130% 187 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
927GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 192 191 192 194 MB/s
|
99.5%
Outstanding
|
98% 134 MB/s
|
174% 1.3 MB/s
|
|
![]() USB DISK 126GB
113GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 19 0.1 19 19 MB/s
|
66% 41.3 MB/s
|
821% 12.2 MB/s
|
916% 14.7 MB/s
|
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
61% | 46% | 50 | 201 | 24 | 167 | 27" | 1920 1080 | SAM710E F27G3xTF |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $255Bench 99%, 89,595 samples | 1,847x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $218Bench 98%, 123,561 samples | 1,291x |
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $459Bench 100%, 36,998 samples | 1,060x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3080Nvidia $830Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1,062x |
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 861x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,166Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 592x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $1,665 |