Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:34
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 221
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 774
70% 586 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.1% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 75.6
44% 62.8 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 45.2
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 439 443 437 429 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 424
Mixed 440
SusWrite 437
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 49.1
162% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 192
146% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$88
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 260 260 259 259 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 296
Mixed 329
SusWrite 280
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 48.8
163% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 158
130% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
927GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 192 191 192 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 101
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 191
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 112%
USB DISK 126GB
113GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 19 0.1 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Write 30.8
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 11.7
66% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 9
821% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 10.2
916% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 BL16G32C16U4WL.M16FE BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 BL16G32C16U4WL.M16FE 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 35.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 34.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 0P 5R 9G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 46% 50 201 24 167 27" 1920 1080 SAM710E F27G3xTF
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback