Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14C4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Prestige 14Evo A11M
MotherboardMSI MS-14C4  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:33
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 64.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 249
79% 148 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 612
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 103
Parallax 144
112% 128 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 125
Splatting 101
106% 134 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 123 123 113 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 912
Write 114
Mixed 197
SusWrite 119
72% 336 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 35.6
150% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 154
122% 173 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 59.8
MC Mixed 41.9
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 16.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 5R 7G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 12% 123 514 388 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC21A PHL 272V8
Typical MS-14C4 Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-14C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback