Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star PE62 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16JF  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:10
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 170
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 367
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1221) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.6 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.3
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 208 129 131 134 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 986
Write 908
Mixed 495
SusWrite 147
141% 634 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 43.4
131% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 626
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 417
308% 416 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 108%
Great: 199%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
403GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 97.5
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 98.3
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15D6
Typical MS-16JF Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback