Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 13:14
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 211
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 548
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.5% Good
Lighting 80.2
Reflection 103
Parallax 63.3
65% 82.1 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 72.6
60% 72.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1104J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 338 166 158 178 201 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 446
Write 436
Mixed 192
SusWrite 236
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 12.3
91% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 15.1
70% 152 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 102%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
563GB free
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 415 404 433 432 436 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 416
Mixed 418
SusWrite 422
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 29.3
131% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 48.4
97% 191 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
174GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 139 145 146 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 103
Write 113
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 145
70% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 1TB
262GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 31 34 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 56.6
Write 28.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 32.5
44% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 29.4
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 17 197 19 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C8 ASUS VP278
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback