Gigabyte GA-H310M S2

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 days ago, 10 days ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 13:07
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	54%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$160 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 228 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 582 64% 505 Pts	64-Core 598 37% 598 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$100 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.8 Reflection 46.7 Parallax 37.1 29% 39.9 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 26.4 27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
EVM 1TB 1TB 723GB free (System drive) Firmware: W0621B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 398 400 423 432 427 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84% Excellent	Read 445 Write 378 Mixed 350 SusWrite 412 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 18.6 98% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 29.7 90% 190 MB/s

Toshiba P300 1TB-$55 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 184 179 178 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 192 Mixed 29 SusWrite 181 106% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V02D4LF8GB5285282400 1x8GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 9.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	144	24.5"	1280 720	AUS25A6 VG259

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2 Builds (Compare 495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	142x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	93x
Core i5-8400Intel $160Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	43x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $24Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	23x
A400 120GBKingston $35Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	17x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x
CBD24D4U7S8MA-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 74%, 132 samples	10x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $148	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $93	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $265	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16