Today's hottest deals

Acer NG-AN515-54-77N4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer NG-AN515-54-77N4  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFL
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 13:07
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 188
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 494
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0
4% 5.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0513A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1211 1271 1006 332 278 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,531
Write 1,282
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 737
258% 1,151 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 26.4
137% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 395
323% 455 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 168%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 15.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 18.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Typical NG-AN515-54-77N4 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer NG-AN515-54-77N4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback