Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H87M-PRO  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 13:06
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$125
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 189
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 502
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 69.4
44% 60.1 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 39.2
41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$79
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 170 160 156 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 406
Write 209
Mixed 237
SusWrite 159
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 41.9
143% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 202
150% 199 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1280 720 LG HDR WFHD
Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback