Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3330 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro 3330 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 17A0
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 12:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 136
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 211
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 17A0) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 87 58 69 91 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 75.7
Write 90.6
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 76.7
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 4.4 8.1 8.8 9.1 8.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 109
Write 11.4
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 7.8
32% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
48% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01D3L84GB52852813 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 24 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical Pro 3330 MT Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3330 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback