Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 12:25
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$142
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 210
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 504
55% 436 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 66.9
50% 64.6 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 59.9
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 245 305 328 334 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 360
Write 325
Mixed 225
SusWrite 315
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 277
224% 317 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
409GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 80 103 102 87 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 58.9
Write 84.1
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 93.4
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$35
457GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 101 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 70.5
Mixed 51
SusWrite 99.6
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 7.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2,495
Write 1
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.3
446% 625 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
978GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 70 72 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 73.1
Write 56.6
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 71.5
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 76%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 83 83 82 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 73.1
Write 83.1
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 83.1
103% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D37 C27F591
Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback