Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:56
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 799
75% 623 Pts
64-Core 864
53% 864 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 260
Parallax 492
201% 333 fps
MRender 401
Gravity 214
Splatting 334
259% 316 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 197%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 139 143 140 134 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 481
Write 256
Mixed 250
SusWrite 142
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 39.1
144% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 125
132% 223 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
24GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 504
Write 483
Mixed 456
107% 481 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58.4
194% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Corsair MP600 CORE XT 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: ELFMC1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2187 2459 2410 2419 2279 2403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 1,870
Write 2419
Mixed 2,039
SusWrite 2,360
492% 2,172 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 81.3
283% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,290
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 1,122
826% 1,093 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 354%
Great: 451%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 34.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 27.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2401 VG249Q1R
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback