Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:55
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 116
53% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 120
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 347
Write 369
Mixed 329
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 30.5
112% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 196
165% 238 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
23GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.4
Write 1.2
Mixed 10.7
13% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
13% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 46 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC0CF PHL 223V5
Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 1,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback