Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:54
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 171
2-Core 333
104% 195 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 800
90% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$222
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 89.9
80% 94.3 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 74.3
71% 89.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$98
615GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1537 874 882 886 882 939 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,921
Write 1,816
Mixed 1,577
SusWrite 1000
354% 1,578 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 47.9
160% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 300
280% 457 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 211%
Great: 347%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
442GB free
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1776 1794 1355 460 454 464 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,476
Write 1,826
Mixed 1,450
SusWrite 1,050
379% 1,701 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 49.3
162% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 297
276% 448 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 237%
Great: 332%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
323GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 410 423 422 419 418 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 488
Write 419
Mixed 364
SusWrite 419
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 34.1
117% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 198
143% 186 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
91GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 420 416 391 409 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 409
Mixed 384
SusWrite 411
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 40.4
136% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 198
141% 183 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
172GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 396 397 391 396 394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 484
Write 392
Mixed 400
SusWrite 394
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 36.8
122% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 138
111% 159 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 40.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 28.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 100%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 165 27" 1280 720 CMT2701 GM27-CFX
Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,034
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $258Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback