Lenovo 3053AC8

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 17%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3053AC8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3053AC8
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:53
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Memory 29
1-Core 12.5
2-Core 17.4
14% 19.6 Pts
4-Core 17.2
8-Core 17.5
2% 17.4 Pts
64-Core 18.3
1% 18.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Legend(17AA 21EC) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 133 136 161 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.3% Poor
Read 118
Write 109
Mixed 101
SusWrite 148
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 4.7
18% 6.33 MB/s
DQ Read 44.1
DQ Write 41.4
DQ Mixed 43.8
33% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4D34373142353637 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.17 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 1
3% 1.1 GB/s
Latency 305
13% 305 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 29 60 11.6" 1280 720 LEN40D1
The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $195Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback