Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 29 1-Core 12.5 2-Core 17.4 14% 19.6 Pts	4-Core 17.2 8-Core 17.5 2% 17.4 Pts	64-Core 18.3 1% 18.3 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21EC) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.41% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R3G5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 133 136 161 151 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.3% Poor	Read 118 Write 109 Mixed 101 SusWrite 148 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 4.7 18% 6.33 MB/s	DQ Read 44.1 DQ Write 41.4 DQ Mixed 43.8 33% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4D34373142353637 2x2GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 2.7 6% 2.17 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 305 13% 305 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	41	29	60	11.6"	1280 720	LEN40D1

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16