PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA78LMT-US2H (all builds) |
Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100318 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 11:53 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 48% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
54.3%
Above average
|
49% 74.9 Pts
|
19% 138 Pts
|
10% 160 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
|
17%
Very poor
|
16% 24.3 fps
|
19% 23.4 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 8GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.7%
Poor
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
18% 6.4 GB/s
|
53% 75.3 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 63 | 42 | 60 | 23" | 1280 720 | GSM59C6 2D FHD LG TV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 11x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 6x |
Athlon II X4 635AMDBench 45%, 5,306 samples | 4x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 5x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 3x |
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $100 |