Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:52
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 326
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 895
92% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,469
91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 20
Parallax 1.3
20% 15.4 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 22.5
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 420
Write 411
Mixed 5.7
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
435GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 105 106 103 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 105
Write 88.8
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 105
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 61%
WD WD20EFAX-68FB5N0 2TB
975GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 146 148 148 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 132
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 147
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
215% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 26.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 21.5" 1280 720 SAM103A S22R35x
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback