Today's hottest deals

Intel H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel H55  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:51
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$212
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 132
62% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 309
34% 270 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 405 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.2
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$26
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 89 66 77 66 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 231
Write 200
Mixed 203
SusWrite 96
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 12.5
60% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 54
DQ Mixed 1.1
27% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
240GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 79 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
48% Average
Read 85.3
Write 83.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 82
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 15 60 19" 1280 720 XXX0000 LED Monitor
Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback