PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190312 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 11:48 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
83.1%
Excellent
|
81% 145 Pts
|
70% 545 Pts
|
40% 640 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
|
4.54%
Terrible
|
5% 6.47 fps
|
4% 5.37 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial BX300 240GB-$55
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 408 425 399 365 366 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
98% 436 MB/s
|
162% 60.9 MB/s
|
223% 307 MB/s
|
![]() Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
417GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 150 149 148 149 151 MB/s
|
66.2%
Good
|
63% 87.4 MB/s
|
127% 1 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Elements 25A2 1TB
435GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 39 39 MB/s
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
51% 37.7 MB/s
|
91% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
34.4%
Below average
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
28% 9.9 GB/s
|
46% 87 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 60 | 19" | 1280 720 | HWP264C HP vs19 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,652x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 787x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 163x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 409x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $170Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 340x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $205Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 314x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $287 |