Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results

Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 73%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-R R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190312
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:48
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$145
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 615
70% 545 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.47 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 408 425 399 365 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 438
Mixed 417
SusWrite 399
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 46.3
162% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 283
223% 307 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$24
417GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 150 149 148 149 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 83
Write 97.2
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 148
63% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
435GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 40
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 39.4
51% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 19" 1280 720 HWP264C HP vs19
Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback