Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:32
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$69
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 26.3
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 106
34% 64 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 222
25% 195 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$395
Asus(1043 8825) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 142
Parallax 137
132% 147 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 117
Splatting 88
95% 120 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 116%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 8.9 7.5 7.5 7.8 8.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 90%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
642GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 62 56 53 57 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 60.6
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 6.1
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 14 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22FD ASUS VS228
Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback