Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 242%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics248% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:15
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 976
94% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$732
Device(1771 17AF) ≥ 4GB; ‎B0BRQ4QB6F
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
248% Outstanding
Lighting 364
Reflection 338
Parallax 360
297% 354 fps
MRender 483
Gravity 304
Splatting 220
261% 335 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 248%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 781 475 388 494 496 420 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2548
Write 2,350
Mixed 2,207
SusWrite 509
426% 1,903 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 78.4
279% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,843
DQ Write 1,413
DQ Mixed 1,496
1,154% 1,584 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 291%
Great: 494%
CT4000P3SSD8 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2202 626 438 431 435 439 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,892
Write 2,431
Mixed 2120
SusWrite 762
406% 1,801 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 74.3
262% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,649
DQ Write 1,143
DQ Mixed 1,400
1,044% 1,397 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 265%
Great: 426%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
209GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 1080 1169 1149 1082 1162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,502
Write 1,193
Mixed 799
SusWrite 1,139
259% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 52.1
186% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 697
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 528
397% 539 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 211%
Great: 220%
Inateck FE202x Series 2TB
580GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.8% Good
Read 38.8
Write 38.7
Mixed 38
SusWrite 39.1
53% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 13.4
984% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 11.1
DQ Write 21.8
DQ Mixed 13.9
1,256% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 31.8
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 30.4
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 84.6" 1280 720 PIO1267 AV Receiver
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $857
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $341
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback