PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H410M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200727 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 10:55 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i3-10100F-$80
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
83% 146 Pts
|
62% 494 Pts
|
41% 661 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$184
EVGA(3842 1251) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.6%
Above average
|
51% 72.1 fps
|
53% 64.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston A400 240GB-$24
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 32 21 4.2 23 3.6 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
8% 34.6 MB/s
|
82% 28.6 MB/s
|
14% 27.1 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$33
96GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 62 62 61 MB/s
|
45%
Average
|
59% 79.7 MB/s
|
156% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Elements 25A2 1TB
439GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 83 83 83 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
112% 84 MB/s
|
100% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
83% 29.2 GB/s
|
67% 23.5 GB/s
|
56% 71.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 44 | 12 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | SAM0D32 C27F390 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $107Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 1,206x |
Core i3-10100FIntel $80Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 831x |
Core i5-10400Intel $140Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 580x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples | 376x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 330x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 315x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Outstanding | Total price: $212 |