Asus PRIME H770-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 19 days ago, 8 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H770-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230908
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 10:54
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	94%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-13400F-$201 3,529 User benchmarks, average bench 106% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 74.5 1-Core 193 2-Core 377 111% 215 Pts	4-Core 689 8-Core 1,184 114% 936 Pts	64-Core 1,644 102% 1,644 Pts
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$100 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 41.4 Parallax 38.5 30% 39.1 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 28 28% 35 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB 6,628 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 169GB free Firmware: P9CR40A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,619 Write 3,953 Mixed 2,537 614% 2,703 MB/s	4K Read 61.9 4K Write 303 4K Mixed 98 380% 154 MB/s	DQ Read 1,893 DQ Write 1,228 DQ Mixed 1,512 1,141% 1,544 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 517%
WD Elements 2620 4TB 3,758 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 83 81 80 79 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 103 Write 84.7 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 81 106% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.7 163% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 2x8GB 1,266 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	143% Outstanding	MC Read 60.9 MC Write 53.2 MC Mixed 51.1 157% 55.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 45.9 SC Mixed 27.8 90% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	120	27"	1280 720	GPR0020 INTENSE X20

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H770-PLUS Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H770-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-13400FIntel $201Bench 106%, 3,529 samples	2x
Core i9-12900KFIntel $310Bench 117%, 15,291 samples	1x
Core i5-12600KIntel $195Bench 109%, 57,538 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
RTX 4060-TiNvidia $360Bench 145%, 8,223 samples	2x
RTX 4080Nvidia $1,130Bench 291%, 20,833 samples	2x

SSD
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $59Bench 112%, 65,806 samples	1x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $77Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1x

RAM
KF552C40-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 155%, 10,661 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GBCorsairBench 173%, 2,249 samples	2x
CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 2x8GBCrucialBench 128%, 1,266 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $401

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12400F $149	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $195	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16