Today's hottest deals

HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-s0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-s0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BD4
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 10:47
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 164
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 547
49% 416 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
HP(103C 8BD4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.60
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 68.9
36% 44.9 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 68.2
42% 48 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1175 755 739 762 773 784 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,396
Write 1,556
Mixed 1,565
SusWrite 832
353% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 52.5
174% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 526
349% 428 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 218%
Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 49.2
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 42.4
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 36.3
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 39.6
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 110%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 16" 1280 720 CMN162E
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-s0xxx Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-s0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback