Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_TUF505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_TUF505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 10:46
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 108
2-Core 204
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 526
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.4% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 52.1
47% 65.9 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 51
Splatting 50.3
40% 48 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 46%
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 20.7
12% 16.6 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 12.7
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 975 981 833 260 150 779 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1043
Write 997
Mixed 890
SusWrite 663
202% 898 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 39.2
128% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 480
DQ Mixed 542
388% 495 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 143%
Great: 181%
WD WD1600BJKT-75F4T0 160GB
60GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 58.7
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 58.4
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FR 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 22.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 120 40.1" 1536 841 SAM0B60 SAMSUNG
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_TUF505DT Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_TUF505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $148Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $93Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $265Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback