Asus M3A79-T DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M3A79-T DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '18 at 03:46
Run Duration	398 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor model unknown 429 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22% Poor	Memory 35.8 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 42.2 22% 33.4 Pts	4-Core 47.7 8-Core 55.2 7% 51.5 Pts	64-Core 53.5 3% 53.5 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT 12,718 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 236E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.29% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.41 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2.13 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.29% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8596536135 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 119305601562871 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 323 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 254 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 39 44 68722360359 (C2) HDA temperature 39 44 68722360359 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8596536135 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 8596536135 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 8596536135 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 68719476737 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12299 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3146 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3146 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3866 (F4) Unknown 98 98 5636182	43.2% Average	Read 240 Write 124 Mixed 151 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 15.5 73% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 90.7 DQ Write 97.6 DQ Mixed 33.2 42% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 837GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 170 4050 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9222 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22202 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 666 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 416 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 169 169 94330 (C2) HDA temperature 110 98 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 1491 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	66.4% Good	Read 120 Write 111 Mixed 100 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.13 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.17 62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 84%
General USB Flash Disk 2GB 429 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Read 12.3 Write 3.28 Mixed 4.47 7% 6.67 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.006 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 6.3 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M3A79-T DELUXE Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3A79-T DELUXE

CPU
Phenom 9950AMDBench 46%, 2,150 samples	10x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	5x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	3x
R9 285AMD $189Bench 32%, 6,276 samples	3x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	6x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TBBench 84%, 5,114 samples	2x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	1x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	6x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	6x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $834

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16