Asus H110M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20151116
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 03:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$62 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 184 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 260 34% 256 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 3534) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.88 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.57 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$18 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 61 54 64 64 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 370 Write 211 Mixed 164 SusWrite 72.7 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 12.5 48% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 88.9 DQ Write 82.7 DQ Mixed 40.2 43% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 131 132 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 127 Write 130 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 132 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Silicon-Power SP008GBLFU213B02 1x8GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 10.4 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	52	24	60	21.5"	1280 720	SAM08AB S22B300

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $125Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	293x
Core i7-6700Intel $220Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	166x
Core i5-6400Intel $100Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	137x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	118x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	99x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $140Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	79x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $80Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $50Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
A400 480GBKingston $34Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBHyperX $299Bench 79%, 20,912 samples	28x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	24x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $146	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $189	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16