Asus GL702VM

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

9 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 18 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 6 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus GL702VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 03:57
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 183 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 385 42% 335 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.1% Average	Lighting 56.9 Reflection 102 Parallax 60.8 46% 73.3 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 60 Splatting 62.2 51% 63 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30100P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 197 203 163 176 158 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 453 Write 222 Mixed 199 SusWrite 186 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 22 87% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 170 153% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 110GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 64 66 68 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 82.6 Write 82.8 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 66.7 46% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 8,819 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	75	17.3"	1920 1009	LGD04E8

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	387x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	412x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $378Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
RTX 3060Nvidia $300Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	88x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	41x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	16x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	136x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	31x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GBSamsungBench 50%, 3,179 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $146	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $189	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16