Asus GL702VM

Performance Results

Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop 75%
Workstation 29%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 03:57
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 183
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 385
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 102
Parallax 60.8
46% 73.3 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 60
Splatting 62.2
51% 63 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30100P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 197 203 163 176 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
68% Good
Read 453
Write 222
Mixed 199
SusWrite 186
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 22
87% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 170
153% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68%
Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 64 66 68 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 82.6
Write 82.8
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 66.7
46% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 17.3" 1920 1009 LGD04E8
Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 30%
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 25%

System: Asus GL702VM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback