Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 03:56
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 267
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 670
76% 595 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 213 46 60 43 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 142
Write 96
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 122
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 10.9
42% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 102%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
145GB free
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 464 238 341 284 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 259
Mixed 252
SusWrite 366
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 36.5
142% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 222
184% 268 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 39.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 32.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback