Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H270-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180110
Uptime	16.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 02:35
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700k VH 2,577 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 130 2-Core 234 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 692 68% 559 Pts	64-Core 686 42% 686 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C304) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.4% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 127 Parallax 116 93% 119 fps	MRender 91.3 Gravity 121 Splatting 110 89% 107 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 98 96 93 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 433 Write 132 Mixed 152 SusWrite 97.2 44% 203 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 29.9 118% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 153 136% 212 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 115%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 268GB free Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 458 444 447 407 284 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 452 Mixed 431 SusWrite 410 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 51.1 167% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 361 272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	75.2% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 21.9 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 23.1 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	120	34.8"	1280 720	SAM72F2 Odyssey G85SB

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $185Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	255x
Core i5-7500Intel $121Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	161x
Core i7-7700KIntel $289Bench 84%, 634,862 samples	132x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $140Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	134x
GTX 1070Nvidia $119Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	90x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x

SSD
MX300 275GBCrucial $160Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $119Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	18x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	26x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	26x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $524

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $148	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $93	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $265	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16