Today's hottest deals

Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 23:11
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 91.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 159
76% 124 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 136
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$271
PNY(196E 138E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 112
Parallax 119
102% 119 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 96.3
Splatting 85.9
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 239 80 66 68 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 444
Write 234
Mixed 292
SusWrite 113
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 26.7
109% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 156
133% 193 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.9" 1280 720 HPN3509 HP N246v
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $111

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback