Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 03:45
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 628
74% 573 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 136
Parallax 99.3
87% 114 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.7
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 77 45 64 45 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 245
Write 81.2
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 56.9
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 11.3
54% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 17.3
14% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 102%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
145GB free
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 360 352 474 476 322 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 395
Mixed 432
SusWrite 398
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 40.1
143% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 304
241% 335 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 39.2
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 30.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 24" 1280 720 GSM5C01 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $572
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback