| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Cdcpointspa WBIBX10J (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel DP55WB |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120626 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 30 '17 at 19:54 |
| Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.6%
Good
|
61% 101 Pts
|
38% 280 Pts
|
17% 269 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
18% 18.3 fps
|
17% 21.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
37.4%
Below average
|
37% 168 MB/s
|
60% 19.8 MB/s
|
16% 26.4 MB/s
|
|
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
14% 18.3 MB/s
|
22% 0.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 0x 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.3%
Poor
|
22% 7.57 GB/s
|
25% 8.9 GB/s
|
53% 75.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical WBIBX10J Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Cdcpointspa WBIBX10J
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $171 |