HP Compaq nw9440 (GB840ES#ABD)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq nw9440 (GB840ES#ABD)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 309F
Memory1.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '17 at 12:11
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7400-$110
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 57
1-Core 24
2-Core 48.9
30% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 48.9
8-Core 49.6
7% 49.2 Pts
64-Core 49
3% 49 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1500M
HP(103C 309F) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 259.47
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.36 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200BEVS-16VAT0 320GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 14.01A14 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 58.5
Mixed 24
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.33
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback