Today's hottest deals

MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 21:51
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 219
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 720
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 1069
66% 1069 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
Asus(1043 8874) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 259
Reflection 301
Parallax 307
211% 289 fps
MRender 379
Gravity 232
Splatting 204
214% 272 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 190%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
611GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1211 992 995 1013 1014 1016 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,426
Write 2,271
Mixed 1,636
SusWrite 1,040
361% 1,593 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 52.5
161% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 698
526% 715 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 203%
Great: 298%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
881GB free
Firmware: SBK00104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 565 561 566 561 555 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,951
Write 601
Mixed 584
SusWrite 626
206% 941 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 19
126% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 555
DQ Mixed 283
345% 617 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 187%
Great: 402%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1643 2283 2273 2313 2332 2260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,683
Write 1,279
Mixed 1,640
SusWrite 2,184
383% 1,696 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 60.2
200% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 532
388% 503 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 285%
Great: 387%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
80GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 53 43 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 127
Write 54.7
Mixed 35
SusWrite 45.1
75% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.6
122% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 35.5
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 30.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 VSCC336 VX3211-4K
Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $917
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback