Acer AOD270

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Acer AOD270 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer JE01_CT
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120305
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '17 at 00:02
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2600 2,255 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Memory 31.8 1-Core 4.7 2-Core 9.4 13% 15.3 Pts	4-Core 13 8-Core 11 2% 12 Pts	64-Core 10.8 1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tcsunbow-x3 60GB 60GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0607A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 88 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 104 (A3) Unknown 100 100 3 (A4) Unknown 100 100 38734 (A5) Unknown 100 100 33 (A6) Unknown 100 100 17 (A7) Unknown 100 100 20 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 98 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 40402 (F2) Unknown 100 100 42606 (F5) Unknown 100 100 38734	29.8% Poor	Read 237 Write 153 Mixed 198 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 9.05 4K Mixed 8.07 33% 9.73 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 14.8 DQ Mixed 6.85 8% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 95%
MFGCorp NAND Flash 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID null Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.34% Terrible	Read 20.3 Write 8.4 Mixed 3.55 11% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.12 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 9% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.34% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x2GB 293 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	8.62% Terrible	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.6 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 0.5 4% 1.33 GB/s	Latency 245 16% 245 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.62% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AOD270 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Acer AOD270

CPU
Atom N2600IntelBench 22%, 2,255 samples	1x

GPU
Graphics Media Accelerator 3600IntelBench 0%, 1,010 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GBNanyaBench 17%, 1,374 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AOD270

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer AOD270

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)