Asrock B450M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 231%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics292% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive495% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '23 at 02:11
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 71.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 271
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 852
82% 676 Pts
64-Core 1224
76% 1224 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Gigabyte(1458 40BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
292% Outstanding
Lighting 433
Reflection 416
Parallax 443
353% 431 fps
MRender 553
Gravity 375
Splatting 270
312% 399 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 292%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
495% Outstanding
Read 6,196
Write 51.2
Mixed 101
SusWrite 36.1
332% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 605
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 6.2
927% 205 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 495%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
470GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
804GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 80 88 94 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 80.6
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 23.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical B450M/ac Builds (Compare 1,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback