Lenovo 129946U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 129946U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torpedo
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111115
Uptime76.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 01:34
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3500M APU-$60
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 42.5
29% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 72.5
8-Core 65.5
9% 69 Pts
64-Core 62.7
4% 62.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Legend(17AA 3971) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 70
Mixed 47.2
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.12
31% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.6
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback