MSI MS-1581

Performance Results

Gaming 71%
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF66 11UG
MotherboardMSI MS-1581  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220628
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 07:14
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 59.7
1-Core 151
2-Core 274
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 712
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12EA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12EA) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 126
Parallax 124
94% 122 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 89.7
Splatting 92.5
84% 105 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1 512GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 426 233 278 282 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 1,078
Write 841
Mixed 966
SusWrite 283
177% 792 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 9.3
49% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 422
310% 419 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUOAF90
Typical MS-1581 Builds (Compare 4,989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 16%
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 15%

Motherboard: MSI MS-1581

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback