Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP350V5C-S08IN
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130704
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '17 at 04:53
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 176 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 424 46% 364 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.951.9.3000 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.03% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 6.27 Parallax 5.22 5% 5.91 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 6.7 5% 5.94 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.03% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 5010 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5496 (B1) Unknown 97 97 35 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 51 43 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 50 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13536310763	88.3% Excellent	Read 501 Write 280 Mixed 309 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 24.2 127% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 67.3 116% 229 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GB 5,979 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.3% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	157x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	154x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	115x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	536x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	37x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	19x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	11x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	113x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	36x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $81

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16