Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X75-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '17 at 00:47
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 100 2-Core 198 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 509 54% 431 Pts	64-Core 500 31% 500 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 23 17% 20.8 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 23.8 Splatting 19.2 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 9755108 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 39436389730731 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2174 (AB) Unknown 0 0 1 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 202 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 68 47249096735 (C2) HDA temperature 31 68 47249096735 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9755108 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9755108 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9755108 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11247 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8483 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8483 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14107	35.1% Below average	Read 153 Write 84.9 Mixed 104 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 8.77 70% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 83.7 DQ Write 89.8 DQ Mixed 25.5 36% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 73%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 683GB free Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 4459 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 181 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 93 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 307 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 64 163210067996 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1571	49.1% Average	Read 78.3 Write 92.6 Mixed 96.7 68% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.35 91% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GB 1,045 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	56% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 20 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	72x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	47x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	30x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	29x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16