| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20131106 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 25 '17 at 22:05 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64%
Good
|
60% 99.4 Pts
|
44% 362 Pts
|
28% 459 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB; turbo
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
114%
Outstanding
|
122% 167 fps
|
111% 138 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
62.1%
Good
|
72% 325 MB/s
|
84% 26.6 MB/s
|
43% 71 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
92.5%
Outstanding
|
112% 150 MB/s
|
76% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.7%
Below average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
26% 9.23 GB/s
|
48% 82.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,453 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 424x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 386x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 203x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 67x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $334 |