bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System
Motherboard	Intel DH61CR
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20131112
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 01:19
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 154 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 256 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 537.34 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.4 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 16.9 15% 17.5 fps	MRender 22.8 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 15.7 15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$24 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 238 Write 196 Mixed 202 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 17.8 65% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 135 118% 175 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
USB Mass Storage Device 4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 8168 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 19.1 Write 4.8 Mixed 8.2 11% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.8 79% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 102 8GB 180 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 18.2 Write 6.2 Mixed 6.7 11% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 12GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.5 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	59	60	23.1"	1280 720	GSM5791 E2350

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 22,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,896x
Core i7-2600Intel $174Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,455x
Core i5-3470Intel $149Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	871x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,294x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,105x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	961x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $24Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	785x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	447x
A400 480GBKingston $31Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	401x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	507x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	366x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	286x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12400F $149	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $195	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16